EPSA replies to three responses filed at the 7th Circuit appeals court on the Motion to Transfer MOPR Petitions from the 7th Circuit (CA7) to the DC Circuit (CADC).
Read MoreEPSA Files Motion to DC Circuit Responding to Show Cause Order on PJM MOPR Appeals (Case 20-1131 et al.)
In light of a concurrent motion to transfer filed at the 7th Circuit appeals court, EPSA responds in opposition to a DC Circuit order to show-cause why petitions for review filed after the lottery on PJM MOPR Orders appeals should not be transferred to the 7th Circuit.
Read MoreEPSA Files Motion to Transfer Appeals of FERC PJM MOPR Orders at 7th Circuit Appeals Court (Case 20-1674 et al.)
As an intervenor in the cases, EPSA asks the 7th Circuit to transfer petitions for review of FERC’s PJM MOPR orders pending in that court to the DC Circuit, where they can be considered with petitions for review filed there that were not referred to the 7th Circuit by the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Read MoreEPSA Files Notice of Intent to Participate as an Amicus in MISO Zone 4 Appeal at DC Circuit
EPSA files intent to participate as amicus in MISO Zone 4 Appeal at U.S. Court of Appeals DC Circuit
Read MoreEPSA Joins EEI and ETI in Amicus Brief to Eastern District of California in FERC v. Vitol to Address Statute of Limitations of FERC Enforcement Proceedings
EPSA Joins EEI and ETI in Amicus Brief to Eastern District of California in FERC v. Vitol to Address Statute of Limitations of FERC Enforcement Proceedings
Read MoreEPSA Motion to Intervene Supporting Respondent FERC: New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, et al, v. FERC – U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, Case No. 20-1059 (Appeal of FERC December 2019 MOPR Expansion Order)
EPSA Motion to Intervene Supporting Respondent FERC: New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, et al, v. FERC – U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, Case No. 20-1059 (Appeal of FERC December 2019 MOPR Expansion Order)
Read More