EPSA
EPSA files this limited answer in response to the comments of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sustainable FERC Project, the Sierra Club, and the Union of Concerns Scientists, the answer of PJM and certain other pleadings filed in support of PJM’s July 30, 2021, filing of proposed revisions to its minimum offer price rule.
Read MoreEPSA protests the July 30, 2021, filing by PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. of revisions to its minimum offer price rule. For the reasons set forth in the comments, the revisions proposed in the July 30 PJM Filing are unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory, and the July 30 PJM Filing should be rejected.
Read MoreEPSA urges the Commission to reject the PJM Transmission Owners’ filing due to procedural, increased costs and uncertainty, and anti-competitive concerns. Instead, FERC should allow transmission, interconnection, and network upgrade processes to be assessed on a holistic basis in its recently opened rulemaking proceeding.
Read MoreIn an August 5, 2021, letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Chairman and Commissioners, The Energy Trading Institute (ETI), Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA) and Western Power Trading Forum (WPTF) expressed support for the June 2, 2021, letter sent by a list of distinguished past Commissioners and Chairs urging the Commission to explore expansion of organized regional wholesale power markets, known as Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) and Independent System Operators (ISOs).
Read MoreP3/EPSA fully support PJM’s request for specified waivers and potential extensions of any existing pre-auction deadlines that may be impacted by a revised MSOC.
Read MoreEPSA’s comments highlight the importance of system reliability, commend NERC for the development of these standards and support FERC approval.
Read More