• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electric Power Supply Association

  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • About EPSA
    • Policy Principles
    • EPSA Members
    • Our Staff
    • Careers
  • For Members
    • Join EPSA
    • Committees
  • Contact
  • FAQ
EPSA

EPSA

  • Newsroom
    • Media Contacts
    • Press Releases
    • PowerFacts Blog
    • Factsheets and White Papers
    • Power Moves Newsletter
    • Opinion and Commentary
    • Social Media
    • Podcast
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Policy Positions
    • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    • Federal
    • Judiciary
    • State
    • ISOs/RTOs
  • Power Facts
    • Rising Power Demand
    • Reliable Power
    • Energy Cost Savings
    • Environmental Progress
    • Energy Innovation
    • In Your State
  • Understanding Your Electric Bill
Home / Regulatory & Policy / EPSA and P3 Protest PJM Joint Consumer Advocates Complaint Regarding 2025/2026 BRA 

May 5, 2025

EPSA and P3 Protest PJM Joint Consumer Advocates Complaint Regarding 2025/2026 BRA 

By Bill Zuretti

EPSA and P3 protest and call for rejection of the Joint Consumer Advocates’ Complaint seeking a rerun of the 2025/2026 annual capacity auction; EPSA and P3 explain this retroactive ratemaking request violates the filed rate doctrine.

Venue:       Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Date filed:    May 5, 2025

Docket No.:   EL25-76-000

On May 5, 2025, the Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA) joined the PJM Power Providers Group (P3) on a protest of the Joint Consumer Advocates (JCAs) complaint against PJM regarding results of the 2025/2026 BRA and asking the Commission to direct PJM to rerun the auction. The joint protest calls for rejection of the complaint and explains that complainants have not met their burden under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), including that the complaint targets outcomes (not whether rules are unjust and unreasonable) and raises market power concerns with no basis. Further, the protest argues that the retroactive relief requested violates the filed rate doctrine; FERC does not have the authority to modify market outcomes unless there is evidence of fraud, market manipulation, or a violation of established tariffs; and, outlines that the 2025/2026 BRA outcome is reflective of a market that needs capacity. The protest details recent project announcements demonstrating a market response to the auction prices. 

For this complaint, the JCAs are: the Illinois Attorney General’s Office; Maryland Office of People’s Counsel; and New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel.

Primary Sidebar

Download PDF

Share

Home Page Help Area

Sign up for EPSA’s Power Moves newsletter – a monthly update on the road to a reliable energy future that works for all Americans.

LEARN MORE

Footer

1401 New York Ave. NW
Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005

p 202.628.8200
f 202.628.8260

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About EPSA
  • Filings
  • Newsroom
  • For Members
  • Contact
  • PowerFacts Blog
  • FAQ

Copyright © 2026