• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electric Power Supply Association

  • Podcast
  • About EPSA
    • Our Policy Principles
    • EPSA Members
    • Our Staff
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • FAQ
EPSA

EPSA

  • Filings
    • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    • Federal
    • Judiciary
    • State
    • ISOs/RTOs
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Media Contacts
    • Power Moves Newsletter
    • Factsheets and White Papers
    • Opinion and Commentary
    • Social Media
    • Podcast
  • Competitive Solutions
    • Reliable Power
    • Cost Savings
    • Environmental Progress
      • Competitive Emissions Policy Primers
    • Energy Innovation
    • In Your State
  • For Members
    • EPSA Membership
    • Committees
  • PowerFacts Blog
Home / Filings / EPSA Answers PJM, the PJM IMM, and Other Parties’ Comments in PJM LDA Revisions Proceedings

February 9, 2023

EPSA Answers PJM, the PJM IMM, and Other Parties’ Comments in PJM LDA Revisions Proceedings

By EPSA

Docket Nos.: ER23-729 and EL23-19

Date Filed: February 9, 2023

Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)

Summary:

EPSA’s answer filed at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission responds to the PJM, the PJM Independent Market Monitor (IMM), and the Public Interest Organizations (PIO) answers responding to protests, including EPSA’s protest, in the PJM Section 205 and Section 206 Locational Deliverability Area Reliability Requirement revisions proceedings (LDA Revisions filings). The EPSA answer also responds to certain comments filed in support of the PJM LDA Revisions filings. The EPSA answer emphasizes that nothing in the PJM, the IMM, and PIOs answers or the supporting comments even begins to remedy the fatal flaws in the PJM LDA Revisions filings. In particular, none of these pleadings establishes how PJM’s proposal to change the RPM rules governing the BRA for the 2024/2025 Delivery Year after the posting of auction parameters and after the closing of the auction window can be reconciled with the filed-rate doctrine and the corollary prohibition against retroactive ratemaking. Similarly, neither PJM nor any other party has demonstrated that PJM’s proposed revisions to the definition of the LDA Reliability Requirement is just and reasonable, whether applied to the 2024/2025 Base Residual Auction (BRA) or on a going-forward basis.

Primary Sidebar

Download PDF

Share

Home Page Help Area

Sign up for EPSA’s Power Moves newsletter – a monthly update on the road to a cleaner, affordable and reliable energy future that works for all Americans.

LEARN MORE

Footer

1401 New York Ave. NW
Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005

p 202.628.8200
f 202.628.8260

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About EPSA
  • Filings
  • Newsroom
  • For Members
  • Contact
  • PowerFacts Blog
  • FAQ

Copyright © 2023 | Electric Power Supply Association. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy >