• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electric Power Supply Association

  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • About EPSA
    • Policy Principles
    • EPSA Members
    • Our Staff
    • Careers
  • For Members
    • Join EPSA
    • Committees
  • Contact
  • FAQ
EPSA

EPSA

  • Newsroom
    • Media Contacts
    • Press Releases
    • PowerFacts Blog
    • Factsheets and White Papers
    • Power Moves Newsletter
    • Opinion and Commentary
    • Social Media
    • Podcast
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Policy Positions
    • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    • Federal
    • Judiciary
    • State
    • ISOs/RTOs
  • Power Facts
    • Rising Power Demand
    • Reliable Power
    • Energy Cost Savings
    • Environmental Progress
    • Energy Innovation
    • In Your State
  • Understanding Your Electric Bill
Home / Regulatory & Policy / EPSA Joins P3 and NRG in Answer to Protests in PJM Petition in DPL-South Remand

April 26, 2024

EPSA Joins P3 and NRG in Answer to Protests in PJM Petition in DPL-South Remand

By EPSA

Date filed:    April 26, 2024

Venue:         FERC

Docket No.: ER23-729

Summary: EPSA joined the PJM Power Providers Group (P3) and NRG in an answer filed at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) to the PJM Load Parties and the Maryland Public Service Commission protests regarding PJM’s petition for guidance in the DPL-South auction remand proceeding. Specifically, PJM’s petition requested confirmation that it should publish the results of the Base Residual Auction (BRA) for the 2024/2025 Delivery Year using the auction rules in effect prior to the tariff revisions that took effect on December 24, 2022, and authorization to rerun the Third Incremental Auction for the 2024/2025 Delivery Year. The joint answer explains that notwithstanding protestors’ assertions to the contrary, publishing the results of the 2024/2025 BRA is not only appropriate, it is compelled by the decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals vacating the relevant portions of the Commission’s orders in this proceeding and the circumstances of this case.  The Third Circuit was crystal clear in holding that the Commission’s attempt to change the rules after the 2024/2025 BRA was conducted violated the filed rate doctrine and that holding leaves no room for the Commission to leave this violation unremedied. The joint answer emphasizes that whatever flexibility the FERC may have in fashioning remedies, it has an obligation to remedy the consequences of its legal error. (Of note, EPSA, P3, and NRG were all co-petitioners, along with Constellation, in the consolidated Third Circuit appeals of the PJM DPL-South orders.)

Primary Sidebar

Download PDF

Share

Home Page Help Area

Sign up for EPSA’s Power Moves newsletter – a monthly update on the road to a reliable energy future that works for all Americans.

LEARN MORE

Footer

1401 New York Ave. NW
Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005

p 202.628.8200
f 202.628.8260

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About EPSA
  • Filings
  • Newsroom
  • For Members
  • Contact
  • PowerFacts Blog
  • FAQ

Copyright © 2026