Docket No. EL22-42-000
Date: April 14, 2022
EPSA argued that the Complaint must be summarily rejected, because Complainants have failed to satisfy their burden under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (the “FPA”). Complainants have not made even a prima facie showing that ISO-NE’s existing market rules concerning capacity accreditation and the designation of operating reserves afford undue preferences to “gas-only resources” – i.e., natural gas-fired resources “that have neither dual-fuel capability nor dedicated, firm natural gas supply arrangements . . . .”
