• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electric Power Supply Association

  • Podcast
  • About EPSA
    • Our Policy Principles
    • EPSA Members
    • Our Staff
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • FAQ
EPSA

EPSA

  • Filings
    • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    • Federal
    • Judiciary
    • State
    • ISOs/RTOs
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • Media Contacts
    • Power Moves Newsletter
    • Factsheets and White Papers
    • Opinion and Commentary
    • Social Media
    • Podcast
  • Competitive Solutions
    • Reliable Power
    • Cost Savings
    • Environmental Progress
      • Competitive Emissions Policy Primers
    • Energy Innovation
    • In Your State
  • For Members
    • EPSA Membership
    • Committees
  • PowerFacts Blog
Home / Filings / Indicated Parties file Request for Rehearing at FERC Regarding PJM MSOC

October 5, 2021

Indicated Parties file Request for Rehearing at FERC Regarding PJM MSOC

By EPSA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Independent Market Monitor for PJM v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. } Docket No. EL19-47-000

Office of the People’s Counsel for District of Columbia

Delaware Division of the Public Advocate

Citizens Utility Board

Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor

Maryland Office of People’s Counsel

Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocaten } Docket No. EL19-63-000 (Not Consolidated)

West Virginia Consumer Advocate Division

PJM Industrial Customer Coalition

v.

PJM Interconnection, LLC.

REQUEST FOR REHEARING

On October 4, 2021, Calpine Corporation (“Calpine”), LS Power Associates, L.P. (“LS Power”), and Talen Energy Marketing, LLC (“Talen”), and together with Calpine and LS Power, the “Indicated Suppliers”), the Electric Power Supply Association (“EPSA”), and the PJM Power Providers Group (“P3″), and together with the Indicated Suppliers and EPSA, the (“Indicated Parties”) respectfully request rehearing of the FERC’s September 2, 2021 order regarding the PJM Interconnection, LLC’s (“PJM”) default Market Seller Offer Cap (“MSOC”) under PJM’s Open Access Transmission Tariff (the “Tariff”).

As discussed in detail in the rehearing request, rehearing of the September 2 Order is required because the Commission failed to properly consider the alternatives set forth by the Indicated Suppliers and others, and instead adopted a Market Seller Offer Cap (MSOC) that fails to properly reflect the risks and costs imposed on suppliers and is at odds with PJM’s Capacity Performance structure.

Primary Sidebar

Download PDF

Share

Home Page Help Area

Sign up for EPSA’s Power Moves newsletter – a monthly update on the road to a cleaner, affordable and reliable energy future that works for all Americans.

LEARN MORE

Footer

1401 New York Ave. NW
Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005

p 202.628.8200
f 202.628.8260

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About EPSA
  • Filings
  • Newsroom
  • For Members
  • Contact
  • PowerFacts Blog
  • FAQ

Copyright © 2023 | Electric Power Supply Association. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy >