EPSA
EPSA addresses overarching issues raised in a Department of Energy Request for Information (RFI), Securing the United States Bulk-Power System (BPS). The RFI asks a series of questions on the energy industry’s current practices to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in the supply chain for components of the BPS. EPSA highlights ways in which DOE should focus its inquiry to get the most helpful results in an efficient manner.
Read More
P3/EPSA state support for PJM’s Enhanced Pricing and Dispatch Filing, as it is a significant and necessary step in PJM’s price formation efforts (ER20-2573).
Read MoreEPSA argues the Commission failed to provide a meaningful response to arguments by EPSA and others that allowing states to eliminate the contract option was discriminatory, in violation of the requirements of Section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), and was not the product of reasoned decision-making.
Read MoreUnited States of America Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. } Docket No. EL19-58-002 Comments of the PJM Power Providers Group and the Electric Power Supply Association In the joint comments, the Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA) and the PJM Power Providers Group (P3) (jointly P3/EPSA) conditionally support PJM’s July 6, 2020, […]
Read More
EPSA replies to three responses filed at the 7th Circuit appeals court on the Motion to Transfer MOPR Petitions from the 7th Circuit (CA7) to the DC Circuit (CADC).
Read MoreUnited States of American Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Shell Energy North America (US), L.P. } Docket Nos. EL20-49-000 Comments of the Electric Power Supply Association EPSA has filed to support a limited issued raised by Shell N.A. regarding PJM’s Tariff regarding its FTR Center reporting platform. EPSA agrees that data entered into the […]
Read More