Date Filed: September 30, 2022 Venue: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Docket No. ER22-2762-000 Summary: September 30, 2022, EPSA filed the attached comments on the Western Resource Adequacy Program (WRAP) at FERC (Docket No. ER22-2762) These comments are generally supportive of WRAP as a good first step in the west and stress that governance structures […]
Read MoreReply Brief for Motion to Strike in Appeals of PJM Focused MOPR Orders: PJM Power Providers Group and Electric Power Supply Association v. FERC
Date Filed: September 26, 2022 Venue: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Case Nos.: 21-3068 & 21-3205, consolidated with 21-3243, 22-1158 Filers: Electric Power Supply Association, The PJM Power Providers Group Summary: Petitioners EPSA and P3 in the appeals of PJM’s Focused MOPR FERC proceeding have filed a reply in support of Petitioners’ […]
Read MoreTestimony of the Electric Power Supply Association Regarding Diversity and Inclusion in the Energy Workforce
To read EPSA’s Testimony Regarding Diversity and Inclusion in the Energy Workforce, download the PDF or read on this page.
Read MoreReply Brief of Petitioners in PJM Market Seller Offer Cap Appeals
The reply brief from Joint Petitioners finalizes the briefing in this case, which seeks court review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) orders approving revisions to PJM’s Market Seller Offer Cap (MSOC) because, as approved, the mechanism fails to properly reflect the risks and costs imposed on suppliers and is at odds with PJM’s Capacity Performance structure. Petitioners seek vacatur as the appropriate remedy from the court and focus on three arguments in this brief: FERC failed to justify the exclusion of opportunity costs from capacity offers; FERC failed to justify its categorical exclusion of key risks from capacity offers; and FERC’s determination that capacity sellers lack Section 205 rights is contrary to law.
Read MoreEPSA and P3 Motion to Strike Brief Filed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Solicitor
Petitioners EPSA and P3 in the appeals of PJM’s Focused MOPR FERC proceeding have filed a motion to strike the Respondent brief filed with the 3rd Circuit by FERC’s Solicitor as the brief does not represent the Commission as a body because the Commission did not vote on an order addressing the issues put forth in the brief.
Read MoreEPSA Comments on FERC’s NOPR on One-Time Informational Reports on Extreme Weather Vulnerability Assessments
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION One-Time Informational Reports on Extreme Weather Vulnerability Assessments Climate Change, Extreme Weather, and Electric System Reliability Docket No. RM22-16-000 Summary: EPSA supports FERC’s intent to seek information from Transmission Providers on their policies and processes to assess and develop mitigation plans for extreme weather impacts […]
Read More